Controversy

A Tom Petty oddity: Can anyone explain this lyrical discrepancy?

Another question from a reader. Can you help out with this Tom Petty question?

I just received the Greatest Hits album on vinyl for Christmas and threw it on the record player and interestingly enough there was an unexpected lyric on Mary Jane’s Last Dance. Instead of singing “Last dance with mary jane/one more time to kill the pain” the first chorus on side D sings “Last dance with mary jane/around the room and on again”.

It’s just the first chorus, the remainder of the song has the known “one more time to kill the pain”. After a quick Google search there is really no information on why that would be and it sounds like not every copy of the record has it either. I thought you would be a good person to ask where you think that version emerged from. 

–Ashley

My first reaction is that this was a session outtake/alternative version that was slipped onto the album. I asked if there was anything in the liner notes that might indicate what happened. Ashely replied

There is not much information available on the notes for the record. The track only states “Producers: Rick Rubin with Tom Petty and Mike Campbell. From the album Greatest Hits (1993).” And the album itself was mastered in 2016 by Chris Bellman at Bernie Grundman Mastering, Los Angeles.

Another interesting thing I noticed is that there are some markings on the actual vinyl that have been scratched out and then there are additional codes etched in instead – some sort of inscription. (See below)

It is so jarring to listen to that version of the song, makes you feel like you are in an alternate universe.

I can answer that one. Those are matrix numbers and are often inscribed on the master pressing plate by the engineer responsible for creating them. It looks like there were some last-minute changes to the catalogue system necessitating a hand-written correction.

But back to that lyric change. Online speculation is that this was a screw-up by someone in the chain of production at the label. Or maybe it’s an Easter egg for hardcore petty fans to discover 23 year after it was recorded.

Can anyone else shed some light on this?

Alan Cross

is an internationally known broadcaster, interviewer, writer, consultant, blogger and speaker. In his 40+ years in the music business, Alan has interviewed the biggest names in rock, from David Bowie and U2 to Pearl Jam and the Foo Fighters. He’s also known as a musicologist and documentarian through programs like The Ongoing History of New Music.

Alan Cross has 37969 posts and counting. See all posts by Alan Cross

10 thoughts on “A Tom Petty oddity: Can anyone explain this lyrical discrepancy?

  • Wonder if it’s an alternative version for the music video where he does dance with “Mary Jane” a bit.

    Reply
    • Still might have been an earlier lyric. It lends well to the overall theme of double entendre surrounding a girl who gets “passed around” among boys and the other kind of MJ that gets “passed around the room.” From a female perspective this “hidden lyric” is more depressing than the one we all heard originally -perhaps why they chose the one they did in the 90s 🤷🏼‍♀️

      Reply
  • I remember hearing a story that Mike Campbell didn’t like early versions of the song. Maybe thats earlier lyric than what they actually put on the album?

    Reply
    • Hmm very likely! However how and why that particular version made it on the greatest hits record I am curious to know. Thanks!

      Reply
  • Interestingly the alternate lyric provided here “around the room and on again” is different than the alternate lyric reference in the “Online Speculation” from 2016 . “Round the room and on my way”. The Online speculation also mentions that it was an EU release with one additional track. “Anything That’s Rock n Roll”.

    Reply
    • Oh dear that is entirely my mistake mishearing in a Christmas holiday stupor. It is indeed “round the room and on my way”

      Reply
  • Watch the mtv video of that song, it may have been used for that since it goes w the story

    Reply
    • Interesting theory but no such luck there!

      Reply
  • It appears this has been corrected. I bought one because I’ve been wanting it and I wanted to get this version. When it arrived it had been fixed. I wish they would properly release it even label as alternate and even if it was digitally I just want it

    Reply

Let us know what you think!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.